This weekend I read a very interesting piece in the Bloomberg Businessweek about a public High school in New York that boasts one of the highest acceptance ratios into Ivy League colleges across the nation, and has churned out over-achievers who range from Nobel Prize winners to Silicon Valley Millionaires. But that is not the most amazing feature of the Stuyvesant school. What is even more interesting is the fact that you can not buy your way into this school- it accepts students purely on the basis of an entrance exam. It is one of the last standing bastions of pure meritocracy. A place where the color of money is not green- money is colorless and of no use .
But ironically this is also the biggest drawback for the school. Because alumni cannot hope to increase the chance of getting a seat for their kids or family members by contributing to the school, donations are laughable compared to what private schools get and there is in-fighting among multiple alumni associations!
It was truly an eye opening piece to read but the article failed to shed light on a few key points- first- what is it that makes this under funded, American Public School, so special that it attracts such talented young people, and second- even though there is a lack of funding, how come the school continues to succeed in its mission- offering every capable middle schooler an equal opportunity to top notch education- they just have to pass the entrance test. In ignoring these questions the article starts and ends with the assumption that success requires a lot of money, and the lack of it will mean talent will suffer.
Meritocracy needs to be lauded for its power to equalize humans, and strip people of privileges that a pure accident called birth can bestow on some. It will have its problems because today's capitalist society that believes "everything has a price" can not fathom its lack of one. It says that some things are not, and perhaps should never be, for sale, and that it's the responsibility of the government to recognize special schools and support them if the alumni will not do so on the school's terms- terms which got them where they are to begin with.
But ironically this is also the biggest drawback for the school. Because alumni cannot hope to increase the chance of getting a seat for their kids or family members by contributing to the school, donations are laughable compared to what private schools get and there is in-fighting among multiple alumni associations!
It was truly an eye opening piece to read but the article failed to shed light on a few key points- first- what is it that makes this under funded, American Public School, so special that it attracts such talented young people, and second- even though there is a lack of funding, how come the school continues to succeed in its mission- offering every capable middle schooler an equal opportunity to top notch education- they just have to pass the entrance test. In ignoring these questions the article starts and ends with the assumption that success requires a lot of money, and the lack of it will mean talent will suffer.
Meritocracy needs to be lauded for its power to equalize humans, and strip people of privileges that a pure accident called birth can bestow on some. It will have its problems because today's capitalist society that believes "everything has a price" can not fathom its lack of one. It says that some things are not, and perhaps should never be, for sale, and that it's the responsibility of the government to recognize special schools and support them if the alumni will not do so on the school's terms- terms which got them where they are to begin with.